In today's class, we first were shown a video by an American news channel regarding an Israeli soldier, and Mr. Paterson pointed out the various techniques they had utilized to share biased information. When referring to an Israeli soldier who had been taken by Palestines, the news reporter would frequently use the word "kidnapped", which has a negative image. However, if it is the other way around, they would not refer to Israel's actions as "kidnapping", and would use words that have less of an impact on listeners and different meanings than to what is actually happening. I do understand that America and Israel have a strong relationship and that would automatically put them in a spot where they would need to support Israel, but I strongly believe this is wrong when regarding the information put out for the media.
It is genuinely scary how we all can unconsciously be flooded with incorrect information and never think to doubt the accuracy of the content itself. Also, I had never looked into detail about the relations between Israel and Palestine, so it was shocking to see and hear what was happening in those countries. Although I may not have the power to directly change the circumstances in both Israel and Palestine, I would first like to start by gathering my own information so that I am aware of various standpoints and to be able to come up with my own opinion/conclusion for controversial topics.
Comments
Post a Comment